Petition for determination of tariff for assets under “Eastern Region Strengthening Scheme – XXII” in the Eastern Region -EQ
Summary:
The petitions are as follows:
* **Petition No. 396/TT/2024:** This petition is for the determination of the tariff for assets under the “Eastern Region Strengthening Scheme – XXII”[cite: 1798]. The respondents include Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Limited and five others[cite: 1799].
* **Petition No. 211/TT/2024:** This is a petition for the determination of the transmission tariff for four transmission assets under the “North East Northern/Western Interconnector-I Project” in the North-Eastern Region, for the period up to March 31, 2024[cite: 1799, 1800]. The respondents are Assam Power Distribution Company Limited and eight others[cite: 1800].
* **Petition No. 213/TT/2024:** This petition concerns the determination of the transmission tariff for a single transmission asset, a 220 kV Line Bay at Chamera Pooling Station, for the period up to March 31, 2024[cite: 1801, 1802]. The respondents are Himachal Pradesh Power Transmission Limited and fifteen others[cite: 1802].
* **Petition No. 196/TT/2025:** This petition is for the truing up of the transmission tariff for the 2019-24 period and the determination of the tariff for the 2024-29 period for transmission assets under the “Transmission System associated with RAPP 7 & 8, Part B” in the Northern Region[cite: 1802, 1803]. The respondents include Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited and fifteen others[cite: 1803].
During the hearing, the CERC issued the following directions to PGCIL to be submitted via an affidavit within two weeks:
* **For Petition No. 396/TT/2024:** PGCIL was directed to submit Forms 5A and 7-Part B[cite: 1808, 1809]. Permission was also sought to implead WBSETCL as a party and time was requested to file an amended “Memo of Parties”[cite: 1805].
* **For Petition No. 211/TT/2024 and 213/TT/2024:** The counsels for both the petitioner and respondents noted a mismatch in the implementation of the transmission assets and requested a further hearing[cite: 1807].
* **For Petition No. 196/TT/2025:** The respondent’s counsel requested an adjournment due to the illness of the arguing counsel[cite: 1806].
The Commission also directed the respondents to file their replies within two weeks, and the petitioner was allowed to file a rejoinder within a week after receiving the replies[cite: 1809]. The next hearing for these matters is scheduled for **October 21, 2025, at 2:30 P.M.**[cite: 1811].
—-
For more information please see below link:
