Petition for Truing up and the determination of tariff for the assets under Eastern Region Strengthening Scheme-VIII (ERSS-VIII) – EQ

Summary:

—

### Case Details

| Parameter | Details |
|———–|———|
| **Petition No.** | 565/TT/2025 |
| **Petitioner** | Power Grid Corporation of India Limited (PGCIL) |
| **Respondents** | Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Limited and Others (including WBSETCL as Respondent No. 7) |
| **Subject** | True-up of transmission tariff for 2019–24 period and determination of tariff for 2024–29 period for assets under Eastern Region Strengthening Scheme-VIII (ERSS-VIII) |
| **Date of Hearing** | March 19, 2026 |
| **Status** | Reserved for order |
| **Coram** | Shri Ramesh Babu V., Member; Shri Harish Dudani, Member |

—

### Key Developments

#### Oral Arguments Concluded
– During the hearing, **PGCIL representatives** and the **learned senior counsel for WBSETCL** made detailed oral submissions.
– Both sides concluded their arguments before the Commission.

#### Written Submissions Permitted
– The Commission granted both parties permission to file **written submissions or notes of arguments**.
– Filing timeline: **Within two weeks** from March 19, 2026.
– Parties must exchange copies with the opposing side.

#### Matter Reserved for Order
– Subject to receipt of written submissions, the Commission has **reserved the matter for order**.
– No further hearing date has been scheduled pending issuance of the order.

—

### Parties Present at Hearing

| Party | Representatives |
|——-|—————-|
| **WBSETCL (Respondent No. 7)** | Shri Buddy Ranganadhan, Senior Advocate; Ms. Shweta Sharma, Advocate; Shri Diggaj Pathak, Advocate; Ms. Shefali Tripathi, Advocate; Ms. Vaibhavi Pathak, Advocate; Shri Sriyut Shukla, Advocate |
| **PGCIL (Petitioner)** | Shri Zafrul Hassan, Shri Arjun Malhotra, Shri Angaru Naresh Kumar, Shri Raman Kumar, Shri G. Vijay |

—

### Business Points

1. **Tariff Determination Nearing Finality:** With the conclusion of oral arguments and the Commission reserving the matter for order, the tariff determination for ERSS-VIII assets for both the 2019–24 true-up and 2024–29 period is in its final stages.

2. **Active Respondent Participation:** Unlike other PGCIL tariff petitions where respondents were noted as absent, WBSETCL actively participated through senior counsel, presenting detailed oral arguments. This indicates potential contested issues requiring judicial consideration.

3. **Written Submissions Window:** Both parties have a **two-week window (until approximately April 2, 2026)** to file written notes of arguments. These submissions will form the final record before the Commission issues its order.

4. **No Further Hearing Scheduled:** Since the matter is reserved for order, no further hearing dates will be set unless the Commission requires additional clarifications before issuing its decision.

5. **Retrospective and Prospective Tariff Impact:** The petition covers both **true-up for the 2019–24 period** (retrospective tariff adjustments) and **tariff determination for 2024–29** (prospective rates), making the outcome financially significant for both PGCIL and transmission customers in the Eastern Region.

—

For more information please see below link: