1. Home
  2. Policy & Regulation
  3. Petition for determination of the tariff for “Transmission System for Kurnool Wind /Solar Energy Zone(AP)” in the Southern Region of CERC (Conduct of Business) and (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations – EQ
Petition for determination of the tariff for “Transmission System for Kurnool Wind /Solar Energy Zone(AP)” in the Southern Region of CERC (Conduct of Business) and (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations – EQ

Petition for determination of the tariff for “Transmission System for Kurnool Wind /Solar Energy Zone(AP)” in the Southern Region of CERC (Conduct of Business) and (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations – EQ

0
0

Summary:

**Case Background:**
The petition was filed by **Power Grid Corporation of India Limited (PGCIL)** before the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC). The petition seeks determination of tariff for specific transmission assets under the “Transmission System for Kurnool Wind Energy Zone / Solar Energy Zone (AP) – Part A and Part B” in the Southern Region.

The specific assets include:
– Establishment of a **765/400/220 kV substation at Kurnool-III**.
– **Extension of the 765 kV Kurnool (New) Substation**.
– A **765 kV Kurnool-III to Kurnool (New) double-circuit (D/C) line**.

**Legal Basis:**
The petition was filed under:
– **Section 62** read with **Section 79(1)(d)** of the Electricity Act, 2003 (tariff determination by CERC).
– **Regulation 15(1)(a)** and **Regulation 23** of the CERC (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 2023.
– The **CERC (Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2024**.

**Respondent:**
The main respondent is **Tamil Nadu Power Distribution Corporation Limited (TNPDCL)** , along with others.

**Hearing Details:**
The matter was heard virtually on **19.3.2026** before a bench comprising the Chairperson and three Members.

**Key Submissions:**
– Both PGCIL and TNPDCL made detailed oral submissions and concluded their arguments.
– PGCIL’s counsel specifically requested the Commission to allow **interim tariff** pending final determination of the tariff.

**Commission’s Directions:**
1. Permitted both parties to file **written submissions / notes of arguments within ten days**, with copies exchanged.
2. **Reserved the matter for order** (final decision pending).

Notably, the Commission did not immediately rule on the request for interim tariff but kept it under consideration along with the final determination.

For more information please see below link:

Anand Gupta Editor - EQ Int'l Media Network