1. Home
  2. Policy & Regulation
  3. Petition for determination of transmission tariff for Providing Connectivity to M/s Greenko AP01 IREP Private Limited – EQ
Petition for determination of transmission tariff for Providing Connectivity to M/s Greenko AP01 IREP Private Limited – EQ

Petition for determination of transmission tariff for Providing Connectivity to M/s Greenko AP01 IREP Private Limited – EQ

0
0

Summary:

β€”

### πŸ“ **Case Summary**

* **Petition No.**: 426/TT/2025

* **Petitioner**: Power Grid Corporation of India Limited (PGCIL)

* **Respondents**: Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO) and 15 others

* **Subject**:
Determination of transmission tariff for the 2024–2029 tariff block for:

> β€œImplementation of 1 No. 400kV line bay at Kurnool New Sub-station to provide connectivity to M/s Greenko AP01 IREP Pvt. Ltd (2nd 400kV line bay for Greenko), Bay No.412.”

* **Date of Hearing**: 22 July 2025

* **Coram**: Shri Jishnu Barua (Chairperson), Shri Ramesh Babu V., Shri Harish Dudani, Shri Ravinder Singh Dhillon

β€”

### πŸ”Š **Proceedings and Submissions**

1. **PGCIL’s Submission**:

* The petition was filed to determine the transmission tariff for the above-stated asset.
* PGCIL submitted that they responded to a technical validation letter via an affidavit dated **13 June 2025**.
* They requested the Commission to approve the tariff as filed.

2. **Respondent’s Request** (TANGEDCO):

* Their legal counsel, Shri S. Vallinayagam, requested **additional time to file a reply**.

3. **Commission’s Directions to Respondents**:

* All respondents were directed to **file their replies within two weeks**.
* Replies should be shared with the petitioner in advance.
* The petitioner may file a **rejoinder within two weeks thereafter**.

β€”

### πŸ“Œ **Key Directives from the Commission**

#### 1. **To the Petitioner (PGCIL)** – Submit the following within 2 weeks on affidavit:

a. **Cost Comparison**: A detailed comparison between awarded cost and actual completion cost.
b. **Form 12 Submission**: Include activity-wise delay justification in the following format:

| Asset Activity-wise details | Original Schedule (Start-End) | Actual Schedule (Start-End) | Time Overrun (Days) | Reason for Delay |
| β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€” | —————————– | β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€” | β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”- | β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”- |

c. **Project Status**: Confirm whether **power flow has been achieved** in the stated asset.

#### 2. **To CTUIL (Central Transmission Utility of India Limited)** – Submit the following within 2 weeks on affidavit:

* Referencing the **28th NCT Meeting (MoM dated 21 March 2025)**, confirm whether the **timeline extension under RTM** (Real-Time Monitoring) was implemented for this specific transmission asset.

β€”

### πŸ“… **Next Hearing**

* The Commission scheduled the **next hearing on 16 September 2025**.

β€”

For more information please see below link:

Anand Gupta Editor - EQ Int'l Media Network