Petition of CERC (Conduct of Business) Regulations of Code of Civil Procedure Code – EQ

Summary:

—

### Key Business Points

#### 1. Parties Involved
– **Petitioner:** Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), one of the largest power distribution companies in India.
– **Respondents:** Coastal Gujarat Power Limited (CGPL), which operates the Tata Mundra Ultra Mega Power Project (UMPP), along with other respondents.
– **Other Participants:** Senior counsel and advocates representing Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL) and other parties were also present.

#### 2. Case Status
– **Matter:** The case is part-heard, meaning arguments have already begun in previous sessions and are pending conclusion.
– **Adjournment Reason:** The matter could not be taken up on March 18, 2026, due to a “paucity of time” before the Commission.
– **Petitioner’s Request:** The senior counsel for MSEDCL requested that the matter be listed at the earliest possible date.

#### 3. Business Implications
– **Regulatory Uncertainty Extended:** For the parties involved (MSEDCL, CGPL, GUVNL, and others), the pending resolution of this dispute means ongoing financial or operational uncertainty regarding the matters under litigation (which may involve tariff determinations, power purchase agreements, or related commercial disputes).
– **High Stakes Involvement:** The presence of senior counsel from both sides indicates the significant financial or regulatory importance of the case. MSEDCL and CGPL are major entities in India’s power sector, and the outcome will likely have material implications for power procurement costs or contractual obligations.
– **Scheduling Priority:** The petitioner’s request for an early hearing suggests a desire for swift resolution, possibly to address outstanding payments, tariff adjustments, or other time-sensitive commercial issues.

—-

For more information please see below link: