Petition of CERC (Procedure, Terms and Conditions for Grant of Transmission License and other related matters) Regulations of the transmission licence to NERGS-I Power Transmission Limited – EQ
Summary:
—
## **1. Case Background**
NERGS-I Power Transmission Limited (NREGSPTL) has filed a petition under:
* **Sections 14, 15, and 79(1)(e)** of the Electricity Act, 2003
* **CERC Transmission Licence Regulations, 2009**
seeking grant of a **Transmission Licence** for developing and operating an Inter-State Transmission System (ISTS) project.
Respondents include **CTUIL** and beneficiary utilities such as **APDCL**.
—
## **2. Core Issue During the Hearing**
The matter primarily revolved around **CTUIL’s pending affidavit** regarding the outcome of a **joint meeting** between the parties, as directed by CERC during the earlier hearing on **23 September 2025**.
### **CTUIL’s Status**
* CTUIL served its affidavit to the parties,
* **But did not upload it** on the official CERC e-filing portal.
* CTUIL sought **liberty to upload** the already-served affidavit.
—
## **3. Petitioner’s Submission**
NERGSPTL argued that CTUIL’s affidavit:
* Only contains **minutes or communications** exchanged,
* **Does not present CTUIL’s clear stand** on the issues raised in the petition.
They requested that CERC direct CTUIL to submit a **definite and unambiguous position** on the matter.
—
## **4. Commission’s Observation**
CERC agreed with the Petitioner’s concern and noted that:
* CTUIL must **explicitly state its position**,
* Merely forwarding minutes is insufficient.
—
## **5. Directions Issued by CERC**
### **1. CTUIL Filings**
* **Within 2 days:** Upload the affidavit containing the meeting outcome, as originally directed.
* **Within 2 weeks:** File an **additional affidavit** giving a *clear, firm stand* on all issues, including responses to the Petitioner’s claims.
### **2. Petitioner’s Response**
* NREGSPTL may file a **reply within 2 weeks** after receiving CTUIL’s stand.
### **3. APDCL’s Submissions**
* APDCL is allowed to file a **brief note of submissions** within 4 days after CTUIL’s additional affidavit is filed.
—
## **6. Next Steps**
CERC scheduled the matter for the **next hearing on 4 December 2025**.
—
# **7. Business Implications**
### **For NERGSPTL**
* Progress of its transmission licence application depends on CTUIL’s formal stand.
* A clearer position from CTUIL may either support or challenge NERGSPTL’s claims.
### **For CTUIL**
* Must clarify system planning evaluations, feasibility, and compliance aspects.
* Failing to file a clear affidavit may delay licensing or adversely affect proceedings.
### **For APDCL & Other Beneficiaries**
* Their final submissions may influence regulatory conditions imposed on the licence.
### **For Regulatory Timeline**
* Licensing decision is pending until:
* CTUIL’s clear stand is recorded,
* Responses from Petitioner and APDCL are considered.
—
For more information please see below link:


