1. Home
  2. Policy & Regulation
  3. Petition of the GERC (Conduct of Business) Regulations for commissioning of the entire capacity of 25 MW of Wind-Solar Hybrid Power to Intra-State Transmission System – EQ
Petition of the GERC (Conduct of Business) Regulations for commissioning of the entire capacity of 25 MW of Wind-Solar Hybrid Power to Intra-State Transmission System – EQ

Petition of the GERC (Conduct of Business) Regulations for commissioning of the entire capacity of 25 MW of Wind-Solar Hybrid Power to Intra-State Transmission System – EQ

0
0

Summary:

## **Case Summary – OPWIND Energy Pvt. Ltd. vs. GETCO**

**Forum:** Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (GERC), Gandhinagar
**Petition No.:** 2472 of 2025
**Order Date:** 19 July 2025
**Coram:**

* Mehul M. Gandhi, Member
* S.R. Pandey, Member

### **1. Case Background**

* **Petitioner:** M/s. OPWIND Energy Pvt. Ltd.

* Counsel: Adv. Vineet Gupta (proxy for Adv. Mithun Chakravarthy)
* **Respondent:** Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Ltd. (GETCO)

* Counsel: Ld. Adv. Ms. Shrishti Kindaria with Mr. Shibhraj Jayswal
* **Nature of Petition:**

* Filed under **Sections 86(1)(f), 86(1)(c) & (e)** of the Electricity Act, 2003.
* Relief sought:

* **Extension of time till 31.12.2025** for construction of evacuation infrastructure.
* Permission to use **spare 220 kV bay at Kalawad substation** on temporary basis till 31.12.2025.
* Extension of time for **commissioning of 25 MW Wind-Solar Hybrid Power Project** at 220 kV Kalawad substation (as per procedure dated 07.01.2023 for grant of connectivity to RE projects).

### **2. Proceedings**

* Scheduled for hearing on **16.07.2025**.
* Petitioner’s proxy counsel sought **adjournment** due to personal difficulty of main counsel; requested listing on 18.07.2025.
* Respondent (GETCO) did not oppose adjournment but requested to **expedite** the matter, as it directly concerns project connectivity.

### **3. Commission’s Observations**

* Acknowledged Respondent’s request for expeditious hearing.
* Adjournment granted in the **interest of justice**, since no objection was raised by GETCO.

### **4. Outcome**

* **Type of Order:** Procedural (Adjournment).
* **Effect:** Hearing adjourned; next date of hearing to be intimated separately.

For more information please see below link:

Anand Gupta Editor - EQ Int'l Media Network