1. Home
  2. Policy & Regulation
  3. Petition of the GERC (Conduct of Business) Regulations for purchase of power from 30 MW grid connected wind power under GUVNL’s Wind Tender (III) of the SCOD of the project – EQ
Petition of the GERC (Conduct of Business) Regulations for purchase of power from 30 MW grid connected wind power under GUVNL’s Wind Tender (III) of the SCOD of the project – EQ

Petition of the GERC (Conduct of Business) Regulations for purchase of power from 30 MW grid connected wind power under GUVNL’s Wind Tender (III) of the SCOD of the project – EQ

0
0

Summary:

# ⚖️ Case Details

* **Forum:** Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (GERC), Gandhinagar.
* **Petition No.:** 2406 of 2024.
* **Filed under:** Section 86(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 + GERC Conduct of Business Regulations, 2004.
* **Dispute:** Related to a **PPA dated 12.12.2022** between *Rajpur Renewables Pvt. Ltd.* and *GUVNL* for **30 MW grid-connected wind power** under GUVNL’s Wind Tender (III).
* **Prayer:** Extension of Scheduled Commercial Operation Date (SCOD) due to **Force Majeure events**, and challenge to GUVNL’s letters dated **06.09.2024 & 18.10.2024** rejecting the extension request.

# 👥 Parties

* **Petitioner:** *Rajpur Renewables Pvt. Ltd.*

* Counsel: Ld. Adv. Mr. Nisarg Desai.
* **Respondent:** *Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. (GUVNL)*

* Counsel: Ld. Adv. Mr. Aneesh Bajaj with Mr. Rushabh Soni.
* **Commission Members:** Mehul M. Gandhi, S. R. Pandey.

# 📅 Proceedings (Daily Order dated 28.08.2025)

1. Case listed for hearing on **19.08.2025**.
2. **Petitioner** filed additional submissions on affidavit (with delay) and sought adjournment.
3. **Respondent** objected, noting petitioner already had **3 weeks (per 17.07.2025 order)** but still filed late. Requested **3 weeks to reply**.
4. **Commission’s observations:**

* Petitioner’s delay seen as an attempt to prolong matter and non-compliance with directives — termed “serious, objectionable.”
* Still, Respondent allowed 10 days to file reply (copy to Petitioner).
* Adjournment granted for the day.
5. **Next hearing date:** To be intimated separately.

# 🔑 Implications

* **Dispute status:** The project’s SCOD extension remains undecided; matter is delayed by Petitioner’s late filing.
* **Regulatory warning:** GERC has put on record that delays and non-adherence are objectionable, hinting it may not look favorably at further non-compliance.
* **Immediate next step:** Respondent (GUVNL) to file reply within 10 days, after which the case will proceed.

For more information please see below link:

Anand Gupta Editor - EQ Int'l Media Network