Petition of the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 2004 – EQ
Summary:
—
## **Case Details**
* **Petitioners**:
1. Atul Limited
2. Atul Products Limited
(represented by Adv. Nisarg Desai)
* **Respondents**:
1. Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. (DGVCL)
2. Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Ltd. (GETCO)
(represented by Adv. Srishti Kindaria with Mr. Hetal Patel & Shobhraj Jaiswal).
* **Legal Basis**: Petition under **Section 86 (1) (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003**, read with **Regulations 80 & 82 of GERC (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 2004**.
—
## **Proceedings**
1. **Hearing Date**: 29.08.2025.
2. **Petitioners’ Counsel**: Requested adjournment due to unavailability of Sr. Adv. Saurabh Soparkar.
3. **Respondents’ Counsel**: Also sought adjournment citing unavailability of Sr. Adv. M.G. Ramachandran.
—
## **Commission’s Observations & Order**
* Both parties requested adjournment because their senior counsels were unavailable.
* The Commission (Members: **Mehul M. Gandhi & S.R. Pandey**) **granted adjournment** for the day.
* **Next date of hearing**: To be intimated separately.
* **Order issued on**: 01.09.2025, Gandhinagar.
—
For more information please see below link:
Related posts:
- In the Matter of the GERC (Conduct of Business Regulations, 2004) – EQ
- Petition of the GERC (Terms and Conditions of Intrastate Open Access) and (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 2004 – EQ
- Petition of Code of Civil Procedure of the GERC (Conduct of Business) Regulations, 2004 – EQ
- In the matter of the GERC(Conduct of Business) Regulations of the Tariff Order and Civil Procedure – EQ


