Petition of the GERC (Conduct of Business) Regulations of the evacuation infrastructure at the behest – EQ
Summary:
—
# ⚖️ Case Details
* **Forum:** GERC, Gandhinagar.
* **Petition No.:** 2519 of 2025.
* **Filed under:** Sections 86(1)(c), (e), (f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 + Regs. 80 & 82 of GERC Conduct of Business Regulations, 2004.
* **Petitioner:** *Cleanmax Vayu Pvt. Ltd.*
* Counsel: Ld. Adv. Mr. Mridul Gupta.
* **Respondent:** *Gujarat Energy Transmission Corp. Ltd. (GETCO)*
* Counsel: Ld. Adv. Aneesh Bajaj with Mr. Shobhraj Jaiswal.
* **Coram:** Mehul M. Gandhi & S. R. Pandey (Members).
* **Date:** 01.09.2025.
—
# 📑 Subject Matter
* Petition seeks:
1. **Extension of time** for construction of evacuation infrastructure.
2. **Quashing of GETCO’s letter dated 13.06.2025**, which presumably denied or constrained extension.
—
# 📅 Proceedings (Hearing on 19.08.2025)
1. **Petitioner (Cleanmax Vayu):** Filed the case seeking relief against GETCO’s 13.06.2025 letter; requested adjournment pending reply.
2. **Respondent (GETCO):** Sought **3 weeks’ time** to file its reply.
3. **Petitioner’s Counsel:** Asked for **1 week to file rejoinder** after GETCO’s reply.
4. **Commission’s Direction:**
* GETCO to file reply within 3 weeks (copy to Petitioner).
* Petitioner to file rejoinder within 1 week thereafter (copy to Respondent).
* Next date of hearing to be intimated separately.
—
# 🔑 Implications
* **Core dispute:** Cleanmax Vayu challenges GETCO’s refusal/order (13.06.2025) regarding evacuation infra timelines.
* **Status:** At an early stage — no substantive arguments heard yet.
* **Next steps:** Exchange of written submissions → future hearing.
* **Regulatory tone:** Commission facilitating fair process; substantive relief undecided.
—
For more information please see below link:
