1. Home
  2. Policy & Regulation
  3. Petition of the CERC (Sharing of Inter-State Transmission Charges and Losses) Regulations for PGPL) and Ors. – EQ
Petition of the CERC (Sharing of Inter-State Transmission Charges and Losses) Regulations for PGPL) and Ors. – EQ

Petition of the CERC (Sharing of Inter-State Transmission Charges and Losses) Regulations for PGPL) and Ors. – EQ

0
0

Summary:

### Proceedings & Directions

1. **CTUIL sought additional time** – The counsel for Respondent CTUIL requested more time to file its reply in the matter.

2. **Other Respondents (PGCIL & PGBTLL)** – Their counsel submitted that they have **already filed** their reply.

3. **Petitioners’ request** – The counsel for PGPL sought:
– Liberty to file rejoinder(s) to the replies (already filed or to be filed by Respondents).
– That this case be listed **along with similar cases** (Petition No. 782/MP/2025 and others), preferably in the **last week of April 2026**.

4. **Commission’s directions**:
– **CTUIL** is permitted to file its reply within **three weeks** (copy to Petitioners).
– Petitioners may file their rejoinder(s) within **two weeks** thereafter.
– The petition will be listed for hearing **along with Petition No. 782/MP/2025 and others** on **12th May 2026**.

## Key Business Points

| # | Business Point |
|—|—————-|
| 1 | **Dispute under transmission charges sharing regulations** – The petition invokes Regulation 13(8) of the 2020 Sharing Regulations, which typically deals with deviation from the general methodology or special treatment for specific transmission systems/generators. |
| 2 | **Multiple petitioners involved** – PGPL is not alone; there are “Ors.” (others), indicating a common issue affecting several renewable/generation entities. |
| 3 | **Consolidated hearing with similar petitions** – CERC has directed this case to be heard alongside **Petition No. 782/MP/2025 and others** on 12.05.2026, suggesting a common legal or factual issue. |
| 4 | **CTUIL yet to file its reply** – The Central Transmission Utility has been given **3 weeks** (until mid‑April 2026) to respond, meaning its stance is still unknown. |
| 5 | **PGCIL has already replied** – The central transmission utility (Powergrid) has filed its response, indicating that some issues may already be clear or contested. |
| 6 | **Timeline for rejoinders** – Petitioners will have **2 weeks after CTUIL’s reply** to file rejoinders, pushing the complete pleadings into April/early May 2026. |
| 7 | **Next hearing fixed – 12.05.2026** – No interim relief is recorded; the matter is proceeding toward final hearing on that date. |
| 8 | **Potential impact on transmission charge allocation** – Depending on the outcome, the decision could affect how interstate transmission charges are shared among beneficiaries or specific projects, with financial implications for generators and distribution companies. |

For more information please see below link:

Anand Gupta Editor - EQ Int'l Media Network