1. Home
  2. Policy & Regulation
  3. Petition for Truing up of the transmission tariff for Uravakonda-Veltoor I & ll, Kamavarapukota – Suryapet I &ll lines for tariff period – EQ
Petition for Truing up of the transmission tariff for Uravakonda-Veltoor I & ll, Kamavarapukota – Suryapet I &ll lines for tariff period – EQ

Petition for Truing up of the transmission tariff for Uravakonda-Veltoor I & ll, Kamavarapukota – Suryapet I &ll lines for tariff period – EQ

0
0

Summary:

## Detailed Business & Regulatory Summary – CERC ROP (APTRANSCO Transmission Tariff)

* **Regulatory Authority**

* The matter was heard by the **Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC), New Delhi**, which regulates inter-State transmission tariff and related issues.

* **Petition Overview**

* **Petition No. 104/TT/2024** covers two distinct regulatory exercises:

* **Truing-up of transmission tariff** for the **2014–19 tariff period**.
* **Determination of transmission tariff** for the **2019–24 tariff period**.
* The petition relates to the following transmission assets:

* 400 kV **Uravakonda–Veltoor I & II** lines
* 400 kV **Kamavarapukota–Suryapet I & II** lines

* **Commercial Objective**

* To ensure **accurate recovery of transmission costs** based on actual expenditure for the past control period (2014–19).
* To secure **approved transmission tariff** for the subsequent control period (2019–24), enabling predictable revenue streams.

* **Respondents**

* **Transmission Corporation of Telangana Limited (TSTRANSCO)**.
* **Central Transmission Utility of India Limited (CTUIL)** as Respondent No. 2.
* No appearance from TSTRANSCO; CTUIL participated in the hearing.

* **Hearing Details**

* **Date of Hearing:** 20 November 2025.
* The case was heard by a full Commission bench, underlining its **financial and regulatory significance**.

* **Submissions by the Petitioner**

* Counsel for APTRANSCO confirmed that:

* All pleadings in the matter are **complete**.
* No further documentation or clarification was required at this stage.
* Requested the Commission to **approve tariff as prayed for** in the petition.

* **Regulatory Status**

* With pleadings complete and arguments heard, the Commission **reserved its order**.
* No interim relief or directions were issued during the hearing.

* **Business & Financial Implications**

* A favourable order would:

* Allow APTRANSCO to **true up under- or over-recovered transmission costs** for 2014–19.
* Enable recovery of approved transmission charges for 2019–24.
* Strengthen APTRANSCO’s cash flow certainty for high-voltage transmission assets.
* For beneficiaries and system users:

* Approved tariffs would be factored into **PoC-based transmission charges**.

* **Sector-Level Significance**

* Reinforces the regulatory process of:

* Periodic tariff true-up based on audited actuals.
* Multi-year tariff determination for grid assets.
* Highlights continued coordination between **State Transmission Utilities and CTUIL** in inter-State grid matters.

* **Current Status**

* Matter is **pending final order** from CERC.
* The final decision will determine tariff approval and financial settlement for the covered transmission lines.

For more information please see below link:

Anand Gupta Editor - EQ Int'l Media Network