Petition of the CERC (procedure, terms and conditions for grant of transmission licence and other related matters), regulations to Ananthapuram II Power Transmission Ltd. – EQ
Summary:
—
## **1. Overview of the Proceedings**
This document records the proceedings of the hearing before the **Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC)** in New Delhi on **23.12.2025** regarding two petitions filed by **Anantapur II Power Transmission Limited (AIIPTL)**.
—
## **2. Details of the Petitions**
### **Petition No. 872/TL/2025**
– **Subject:** Petition under **Sections 14 and 15(1) of the Electricity Act, 2003** read with **Regulation 5 of the CERC (Procedure, Terms and Conditions for Grant of Transmission Licence) Regulations, 2024**.
– **Purpose:** Grant of transmission licence to AIIPTL for the **“Transmission System for Integration of Ananthapuram-II REZ – Phase II (3 GW)”**.
– **Respondents:** Central Transmission Utility of India Limited (CTUIL) & Others.
### **Petition No. 873/AT/2025**
– **Subject:** Petition under **Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003**.
– **Purpose:** Adoption of transmission charges discovered through **tariff-based competitive bidding** for the same transmission system.
– **Respondents:** CTUIL & Others.
—
## **3. Hearing Details**
– **Date of Hearing:** 23rd December 2025
– **Bench Composition:**
– Shri Jishnu Barua (Chairperson)
– Shri Ramesh Babu V. (Member)
– Shri Harish Dudani (Member)
– Shri Ravinder Singh Dhillon (Member)
– **Parties Present:**
– **For AIIPTL:** Ms. Swapna Seshadri, Ms. Aishwarya Subramani (Advocates)
– **For CTUIL:** Shri Akshayvat Kislay
– **For RECPDCL:** Shri Ritam Biswas, Shri Shashank Singh
– **Absent:** Most Respondents, except BPC, despite notice.
—
## **4. Submissions by the Petitioner**
– The Petitioner’s counsel submitted that:
1. AIIPTL has **complied with the directions** issued in the previous hearing (dated 3.12.2025).
2. **CTUIL has already issued its recommendations** for the grant of a transmission licence to AIIPTL.
—
## **5. Observations by the Commission**
– **None of the Respondents** (except BPC) were present at the hearing, despite being served notice.
– No objections or replies were filed by the absent respondents.
—
For more information please see below link:
